Skip to main content

Tom Cox - Handsome Highwayman

Tom Cox, the son of a Blandford gentleman, was known as the ‘handsome highwayman.’ With a colourful life, his story had all the ingredients for a Hollywood adventure film.

When his father died he was left some money which he soon squandered. So to fund his high living lifestyle, he took up highway robbery. Near Shepton Mallet, he met Killigrew who was the court jester to King Charles II. Killigrew had been given licence by the King to mock and revile even the most prominent in the land without penalty. Nevertheless, Tom ordered Killigrew to ‘stand and deliver.’ ‘You must be joking’ was the jester’s reply to which Tom retorted:

‘Nay, I am in earnest for though you live by jesting, I cannot. So deliver your money before a brace of balls makes the sun shine through your body!’

Three times in Gloucester, Winchester and Worcester, Tom Cox was tried for highway robbery. Thanks to his charm and silver tongue, he was acquitted. A moneyed lady in Worcester was so besotted that she married him. However, within two years he had not only broken her heart but also spent all her money.

When imprisoned in Ilchester for a failed robbery in Chard, Tom managed to escape and rob his drunken jailer of his silver tankard. Making his way to Coventry, two highwaymen tried to rob him. Tom robbed them of £120 which they had stolen the day before and killed one of them.

On another occasion he met Madame Box, described as a lady of ill-repute, and between the two there was much ill-feeling. When Tom ordered her to ‘stand and deliver’, she cursedly point blank refused to do so. Much offended by her vitriolic response, he ordered her to strip naked reminding her that just as she came into the world naked, so she might leave it. Tom took her money and left Madame Box just standing there.

Travelling in West Sussex, Tom met Mr Hiscock, a dishonest London attorney. When ordered to ‘stand and deliver’ the lawyer explained at length, in a fawning manner, why he should be allowed to keep what he had and continue on his way. Angered by this response, Tom responded with a Latin phrase, with which he knew the lawyer would be familiar, Quietus est. (a metaphor used by Shakespeare for the termination of life.) The dishonest lawyer handed over a purse containing £350 guineas and Tom allowed him on his way permitting him to retain just one guinea. Hiscock returned to London with the intent to recover his losses in the fees to be charged to future clients.

Tom’s last victim was a farmer named Thomas Boucher. Unfortunately for the Blandford born highwayman, during a London trip, Boucher spotted Cox in Essex Street, just off the Strand, and he was arrested. Tom Cox was sentenced to death for the robbery of Boucher and hanged at Tyburn in London on 12 September 1690. He was only 25 years old.

On the way to the gallows, prison chaplain Samuel Smith asked Tom if he wished to say a prayer. Spiritedly as usual, Tom responded by kicking both the clergyman and his hangman off the cart taking them to the gallows.

(Illustration: Tyburn Gallows)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tarrant Rushton's Nuclear Secret

Tarrant Rushton was a large RAF base used for glider operations during World War II. It was then taken over by Flight Refuelling for the conversion of aircraft for the development of aircraft in-flight refuelling. However, between 1958 & 1965, the Tarrant Rushton airfield had a much more secretive and less publicised role. This was in support of the nation’s nuclear bomber deterrent, as Tarrant Rushton airfield became a QRA (Quick Reaction Alert) dispersal unit.   During 1958, contractors Costain reinforced the main runway and carried out other work to ensure the giant bomber aircraft could be accommodated. At times just a few miles from Blandford, there would have been up to four RAF Vickers Valiant bombers at Tarrant Rushton ready to become airborne in minutes charged with nuclear weapons. The bombers were from 148 Squadron at RAF Marham in Norfolk. As there was no suitable accommodation at the airfield, an old US Air Force Hospital building at Martin was used. At the time, the

Chimney Sweep Tragedy

Crown Hotel, Blandford is reckoned to be one of Dorset’s oldest hostelries. Yet its most tragic day, during a long history, must surely be when a young chimney sweep lost his life. The chimney sweep, who was just a child, suffocated and was burnt to death in a Crown Hotel chimney which had been alight a little while before. ‘His cries were dreadful and no-one could give assistance. Part of the chimney was taken down before he was got out.’ (Salisbury & Winchester Gazette 27th March 1780) The lad had gone up one chimney and attempting to go down another had become stuck. At the time children were used to climb up chimneys to clean out soot deposits. With hands and knees, they would shimmy up narrow dark flue spaces packed thick with soot and debris. After the 1731 Great Fire of Blandford it was realised that it was important to sweep chimneys regularly while many rebuilt houses had narrower ones. Smaller chimneys and complicated flues were a potential death trap for children. The sw

Bravest Village Controversy

A Dorset village was once recognised as the bravest in England. That village was Shillingstone in North Dorset. After the outbreak of World War I, the newspaper the Weekly Dispatch inaugurated a competition for the village that sent, in the first six months of the war, the highest percentage of its population into the British Services. According to local newspaper, the Western Gazette Shillingstone sent 90 men out of a total population of 565. (Western Gazette Friday 26 th September 1919) Across the country,  365 other villages sent in their returns. However, the competition would not prove to be short of controversy. The award was made to Knowlton in Kent which with 39 inhabitants and six houses had sent 11 men. However, the Rector of Shillingstone, Dr Cooke protested that Knowlton was too small to be a village and in fact was a hamlet. The matter was referred to the Attorney General, Sir Frederick Smith who held that the original decision should stand as no minimum population ha